Of LEGOS and Creativity

Jackie Drummer • February 1, 2025

Have you ever looked at LEGOS and wondered about how they best stimulate creativity? Which LEGO activities – pre-made kits, complete with step-by-step directions – or free play with LEGOS in a “create your own adventure” scenario – contribute most to creativity in children and adults? And how does this translate into everyday activities? And what are the implications for businesses/the workforce? 


Apparently, the people at LEGO have wondered about these questions, and have done some very interesting research. In this article, The Downstream Consequences of Problem-Solving Mindsets: How Playing with LEGO Influences Creativity, researchers pondered the effect of open-ended vs. closed-ended tasks using LEGOS. Their study has theoretical implications for creativity and mindset research as well as insights for managers and public policy makers. 


According to the researchers, “Recent trends in technology and education suggest that the opportunities to engage in exploratory thinking may be declining for a number of people. Google provides immediate answers, teachers ‘teach to the test,’ and overscheduled lives leave fewer opportunities to discover or pursue new interests. Essentially, many of the problems we face on a daily basis are becoming increasingly more structured and well defined.”


A perfect example of this highly structured and well-defined outcome is the plethora of LEGO “kits”, with precise directions and precise outcomes. Apparently, consumers are increasingly preferring this…“the double-digit growth in LEGO’s revenues indicates that consumers have a strong desire to solve these types of well-structured problems”. (Hansegard and Burkitt 2013).


But at what price?


To research this, LEGO created several experiments. They were interested in understanding how adult consumers reacted to their products. Each randomly assigned participant was given a 40-piece LEGO set and fifteen minutes of work time. Half of the participants were given precise directions and a desired outcome; the other half were asked to “build something”. Then both groups proceeded to a second task, either the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking or the Miller Analogy Task. (Note that a control group proceeded to one of the second tasks without doing the LEGO task. Note also that all participants took two pretests to examine whether factors – such as perceiving that one innately “excels at creativity” could influence performance on the subsequent task).


So, what did the researchers find out? 


Essentially, those who were given the open-ended task of “building something” out of LEGOS outperformed those who were given specific directions when they engaged in future creative tests. Apparently, being creative encouraged/strengthened further creativity. The study also confirmed that the effects were not driven by a person's motivation to be creative; instead the effects were driven by a reduction in the extent of divergent thinking in which the person engages. Creativity, then, like any other “muscle”, needs to be flexed in order to strengthen. The more we explore on our own – without explicit direction – the greater the chances that creativity will flourish.


So, what are the implications for education and the workforce? 


The researchers used Disney as a concrete example: “Disney distinguishes between employees who do ‘routine work’ (e.g., cast members at their theme parks) and those who engage in imaginative work (e.g., ‘imagineers’ who ‘dream up wild ideas about new things a guest might experience’; Sutton 2001). Routine work entails well-defined-problem solving, whereas imaginative work requires engagement in ill-defined-problem solving. Employees rarely switch from one type of work to the other, and our findings suggest that this separation is a good one…employees consistently engaged in routine work would produce less-creative ideas than those who were not so engaged.”


My question then is this: which is more important – more engagement with creative experiences to strengthen the creative disposition and provide a workout for the creativity “muscle” – or allow our ever-increasing reliance on gadgets, directions, and AI to govern our future? What do you think?


As always, I welcome your ideas. Together we grow.


Jackie Drummer, Past President and WATG Board Advisor


Thank you to Esther Vasquez for her translation of this article for our Spanish speaking families and educators.

By Jackie Drummer November 25, 2025
A reflection on the journey of gifted adults, highlighting six developmental stages, key insights from Dr. Ellen Fiedler, and an invitation to explore Bright Adults.
By Dal Drummer November 10, 2025
Almost every week we see headlines in the news lamenting the current state of students and education. Titles such as these – “Chronic Absenteeism Continues to Plague School Systems,” “Why Do Students Spend So Much Time on Their Phones?,” “Should Phones Be Banned From the Classroom and Will That Improve Test Scores?" – are prolific and often worrisome. This often leads to proposed solutions, some which undoubtedly have been tried (both successfully and unsuccessfully) in the past. Why do educational leaders (and politicians) continue to “reinvent the wheel” by proposing and utilizing the same (but re-branded) solutions to student learning problems over the years, dropping one after another in favor of a latest “trend” that will supposedly fix everything? Why aren’t we getting results? I feel the above questions are related and may have an easy solution, one that has produced many studied and practical results. It is a solution that I have experienced in my decades of teaching as well. Recently I read an article in K-12DIVE entitled Drawing connections between art and science can improve academic outcomes by Briana Mendez-Padilla. K-12DIVE is a news outlet that provides business journalism and in-depth reporting on trends in the pre-kindergarten through 12th-grade education sector. In this article, students in Mississippi had persistent low test scores until the school decided to make changes and incorporate the arts (and even artists) to work with and alongside the sciences. As a result, test scores rose significantly, as did social interactions between students. In this article, the author points out that today’s teachers are often competing with technology for kids’ attention. Just taking away technology doesn’t insure greater learning, nor does ignoring it. Teachers need to utilize what attracts kids to technology if they want better attendance and better learning. The author points out that students learn best in different ways (as we know); some students have auditory learning preferences, some kinesthetic, and some visual. Some learn best by reading, others not. Many of today’s students are also heavily into music, movement, and video. This is evidenced by their “plugged in” behaviors and their preference for online creation and viewing. It then stands to reason that the more ways a teacher can present material or allow students to learn using their technology, the more the students will be involved in their learning. Learning or showing evidence of learning can be much more than drawing a picture of the plant cycle (straight out of the science book) or making a shoebox diorama, practices of the past. As educators, we need to move our practices into spaces that our students inhabit. Some simple examples about different ways of learning/demonstrating wave action using science and the arts together could be students acting out wave action through dance using their different music choices (singly or in groups). Teachers could also, using light, prisms, and paints, show how colors can mix and affect how we see our world, and then critically analyze the use of light and color in water portrayed in historic and contemporary works of art (found online, of course). Or students could create music that they feel mimics wave action, mixing and remixing existing music or creating their own. Many of them have technological expertise and a great desire to use it. By teaching our curriculum in their world, using the arts as a vehicle, will, many believe, generate renewed excitement in learning. Finally, in order to develop curricular connections between science and the arts, administrators have to deliberately set aside time for curricular collaboration. Collaboration isn’t something that just magically happens; it takes time, interest, and creativity to connect them, a marriage of will and skill! Professional development time should be used to develop curricular connections, therefore enhancing teachers’ skillsets. Better teaching makes for better student outcomes. Coordination between the arts and sciences shouldn’t take much of a monetary investment; it can often be free, and the results can be priceless. Many free connections exist within community arts organizations, and they can enhance a school or school system. I know this because of my decades of experience as a visual arts specialist and arts coordinator in Milwaukee’s Lincoln Center of the Arts. The arts and sciences have much in common. In fact, through the Renaissance period, the arts and sciences weren’t two separate fields. They were one! They have many connections. Let’s put them back together using today’s technology! See a need for this in your child’s school? Share this article (and others) with them. For more information I direct you to the following articles. https://artsintegration.com/what-is-arts-integration-in-schools/ https://www.kennedy-center.org/education/resources-for-educators/classroom-resources/articles-and-how-tos/articles/collections/arts-integration-resources/what-is-arts-integration/ https://www.edutopia.org/topic/arts-integration/ - Dal Drummer, WATG Board Advisor
By Jenna Cramer November 10, 2025
This blog explains why gifted students need intellectual peers for deeper learning, motivation, and belonging.
By Sarah Kasprowicz November 10, 2025
Highlights Dr. Zakreski’s guidance on supporting neurodivergent gifted learners by asking targeted questions, recognizing sensory cues, and preventing overload.
By Maria Katsaros-Molzahn October 27, 2025
Dr. Dante Dixon inspired educators to help students turn hope into action – building motivation, equity, and resilience to unlock their full potential.
By Jackie Drummer October 27, 2025
Jackie Drummer explores how curiosity, creativity, and critical thinking foster cross-domain thinking—helping students connect ideas and innovate across subjects.
By Maria Katsaros-Molzahn October 13, 2025
The 2025 WATG Conference united educators, parents, and students to explore gifted education topics, inspire hope and resilience, and build momentum for NAGC 2026.
October 10, 2025
This article spotlights CESA 1 PAGE, a parent–educator group in SE Wisconsin that unites districts to offer enrichment, cultural, and STEM opportunities.
By Martha Lopez October 10, 2025
This article explores hope’s role in student outcomes. It offers strategies for educators and parents to cultivate hope in learners.
By German Diaz September 25, 2025
Gifted education ensures equity, fosters innovation, and nurtures leaders. MPS students shine with national honors, proving its lasting impact.
Show More