Reflections and Resolutions

Jackie Drummer • December 28, 2025

Share this article

As we enter into another calendar year, many of us make resolutions to improve our lives and the lives of others. There is always room for improvement in all that we do, and for those of us immersed in gifted education, a new year is a time to reflect on past practices and resolve to imagine promising new practices. 


This November 2025 Thomas Fordham Institute study,
The Leaky Pipeline: Assessing the college outcomes of Ohio’s high-achieving low-income students, provided an opportunity for me to reflect on a topic dear to my heart – the inclusion of underrepresented students, especially those from low income families, in gifted programming. 


In the foreword to this study, Aaron Churchill and Michael J. Petrelli open with this statement,
“America is wasting much of its human capital. That’s because many high-achieving, low-income students—we call them HALO (high achieving-low income) students—fall off the education track and never reach the gates of our top colleges and universities…This represents a tragic loss of potential, while also leaving our best colleges and—later—our most promising occupations bereft of socioeconomic diversity and looking less like the nation writ large.”  This phenomenon is known as the leaky pipeline. 


The key findings of this study in Ohio were that 26% of HALO students were less likely to take advanced math (primarily algebra) during their middle school years. Additionally, they were 34% less likely to take Advanced Placement (AP) classes, International Baccalaureate (IB) classes, or dual enrollment courses during their high school years. Finally, they were 44% less likely to receive gifted services during their middle or high school years, in the form of acceleration or enrichment of curriculum.


Though this study concentrated on students in Ohio, I believe that the findings can be interpreted and extrapolated for other states, including Wisconsin.


Several findings stood out to me as very important, especially as I reflect on my years in gifted education.

  • The academic achievement of HALO students’ peers most strongly predicts the college-going value-added for a district or high school. This outweighs the more common measures of poverty rates or per-pupil spending in a district or school.  In Ohio, these schools were predominantly but not exclusively found in high-achieving suburbs. 
  • The more high-level courses that HALO students are encouraged to take, the greater their chances at entering top colleges and universities. Again, this also outweighs the more common measures of poverty rates or per-pupil spending in a district or school.
  • AP courses are highly predictive of future college admissions but so are other dual-credit options.
  • Taking advanced math classes in middle school is more predictive of future college enrollment than gifted services, though both benefit HALO students.


What I found most interesting about this study was its focus on the middle and high school years, and what needs to be done to support HALO students. My years in gifted education nationally have taught me that though many districts have some programming options at the elementary level, these often are meager (or non-existent beyond math) at the middle school level. And for some students, this gap means that we lose students. Our pipelines are “leaky”. 


Additionally, my former students have given me great insight into what they need to continue their hopeful trajectories. Here are some of their thoughts:

  • Find us early and support our talents. Continue gifted services beyond elementary school. Please don’t make us wait until high school for higher level classes. 
  • Provide school counselor support for our social and emotional needs.
  • Make sure that there are other students who “look like us” in high-level classes.
  • Provide scaffolding when we need it – early and without blame or shame.
  • Continue to encourage us, even when we’re in middle and high school. 
  • Help our parents/caregivers to understand how to support us (e.g., filling out the FAFSA forms - the Free Application for Free Student Aid). Provide help for them, too.
  • Help us apply to colleges and universities; often we are first generation college students, and our parents/caregivers do not have the knowledge or skill to help us, though they want to.
  • Help our families understand that a chance at higher education will not alienate us from them. It is our chance to use our gifts and talents to better our world.


As you enter 2026, I hope you will find time to read the entire Leaky Pipeline study  and to reflect on what it means for gifted children in your community and family. Then resolve to make a difference for all gifted students. Happy New Year!


- Jackie Drummer, Past President and Current Board Advisor, WATG



Thank you to Esther Vazquez for her translation of this article for our Spanish speaking educators and families.

Recent Posts

By Martha Lopez December 28, 2025
This post celebrates 2 gifted Latino MPS students honored at NAGC 2025 & highlights how equity, cultural affirmation, & community support help gifted talent thrive.
December 11, 2025
This post highlights that gifted students are more than test scores, using an ACT example to show how teens can set goals while balancing well-being, interests, and social-emotional needs.
December 11, 2025
This post shares 12 strategies to help gifted, 2E, and 3E children manage emotions, routines, and social needs over winter break, reminding caregivers to tailor support to each child.
December 11, 2025
This post explains OBDRAC, showing why gifted learners need meaningful challenge for healthy brain development and offering practical guidance for parents and teachers.
By Jackie Drummer November 25, 2025
A reflection on the journey of gifted adults, highlighting six developmental stages, key insights from Dr. Ellen Fiedler, and an invitation to explore Bright Adults.
By Dal Drummer November 10, 2025
Almost every week we see headlines in the news lamenting the current state of students and education. Titles such as these – “Chronic Absenteeism Continues to Plague School Systems,” “Why Do Students Spend So Much Time on Their Phones?,” “Should Phones Be Banned From the Classroom and Will That Improve Test Scores?" – are prolific and often worrisome. This often leads to proposed solutions, some which undoubtedly have been tried (both successfully and unsuccessfully) in the past. Why do educational leaders (and politicians) continue to “reinvent the wheel” by proposing and utilizing the same (but re-branded) solutions to student learning problems over the years, dropping one after another in favor of a latest “trend” that will supposedly fix everything? Why aren’t we getting results? I feel the above questions are related and may have an easy solution, one that has produced many studied and practical results. It is a solution that I have experienced in my decades of teaching as well. Recently I read an article in K-12DIVE entitled Drawing connections between art and science can improve academic outcomes by Briana Mendez-Padilla. K-12DIVE is a news outlet that provides business journalism and in-depth reporting on trends in the pre-kindergarten through 12th-grade education sector. In this article, students in Mississippi had persistent low test scores until the school decided to make changes and incorporate the arts (and even artists) to work with and alongside the sciences. As a result, test scores rose significantly, as did social interactions between students. In this article, the author points out that today’s teachers are often competing with technology for kids’ attention. Just taking away technology doesn’t insure greater learning, nor does ignoring it. Teachers need to utilize what attracts kids to technology if they want better attendance and better learning. The author points out that students learn best in different ways (as we know); some students have auditory learning preferences, some kinesthetic, and some visual. Some learn best by reading, others not. Many of today’s students are also heavily into music, movement, and video. This is evidenced by their “plugged in” behaviors and their preference for online creation and viewing. It then stands to reason that the more ways a teacher can present material or allow students to learn using their technology, the more the students will be involved in their learning. Learning or showing evidence of learning can be much more than drawing a picture of the plant cycle (straight out of the science book) or making a shoebox diorama, practices of the past. As educators, we need to move our practices into spaces that our students inhabit. Some simple examples about different ways of learning/demonstrating wave action using science and the arts together could be students acting out wave action through dance using their different music choices (singly or in groups). Teachers could also, using light, prisms, and paints, show how colors can mix and affect how we see our world, and then critically analyze the use of light and color in water portrayed in historic and contemporary works of art (found online, of course). Or students could create music that they feel mimics wave action, mixing and remixing existing music or creating their own. Many of them have technological expertise and a great desire to use it. By teaching our curriculum in their world, using the arts as a vehicle, will, many believe, generate renewed excitement in learning. Finally, in order to develop curricular connections between science and the arts, administrators have to deliberately set aside time for curricular collaboration. Collaboration isn’t something that just magically happens; it takes time, interest, and creativity to connect them, a marriage of will and skill! Professional development time should be used to develop curricular connections, therefore enhancing teachers’ skillsets. Better teaching makes for better student outcomes. Coordination between the arts and sciences shouldn’t take much of a monetary investment; it can often be free, and the results can be priceless. Many free connections exist within community arts organizations, and they can enhance a school or school system. I know this because of my decades of experience as a visual arts specialist and arts coordinator in Milwaukee’s Lincoln Center of the Arts. The arts and sciences have much in common. In fact, through the Renaissance period, the arts and sciences weren’t two separate fields. They were one! They have many connections. Let’s put them back together using today’s technology! See a need for this in your child’s school? Share this article (and others) with them. For more information I direct you to the following articles. https://artsintegration.com/what-is-arts-integration-in-schools/ https://www.kennedy-center.org/education/resources-for-educators/classroom-resources/articles-and-how-tos/articles/collections/arts-integration-resources/what-is-arts-integration/ https://www.edutopia.org/topic/arts-integration/ - Dal Drummer, WATG Board Advisor
By Jenna Cramer November 10, 2025
This blog explains why gifted students need intellectual peers for deeper learning, motivation, and belonging.
By Sarah Kasprowicz November 10, 2025
Highlights Dr. Zakreski’s guidance on supporting neurodivergent gifted learners by asking targeted questions, recognizing sensory cues, and preventing overload.
By Maria Katsaros-Molzahn October 27, 2025
Dr. Dante Dixon inspired educators to help students turn hope into action – building motivation, equity, and resilience to unlock their full potential.
By Jackie Drummer October 27, 2025
Jackie Drummer explores how curiosity, creativity, and critical thinking foster cross-domain thinking—helping students connect ideas and innovate across subjects.
Show More