OBDRAC – An Unwieldy Abbreviation for an Important Concept

December 11, 2025

Share this article

My new mantra is “OBDRAC.” It does not flow off the tongue smoothly nor is it creative, but it stands for an important idea that comes from neuroscience research: “Optimal Brain Development Requires Appropriate Challenge.” This idea is understood among neuroscientists: neurogenesis, the creation of new neurons, takes place in the brain only when the environment is novel or challenging. The application to gifted education is probably obvious, but it seems that OBDRAC could be used more effectively to advocate for appropriately challenging curriculum and programming for advanced learners. Sitting in classrooms working with material that has already been mastered is not supportive of brain development in any child.


In an attempt to challenge my own brain, I decided to use AI to help me write this article (I am a novice with AI). I took a set of slides from a research-based talk that I presented recently* at an international gifted conference that had an AI theme, and I asked ChatGPT to turn my slides into a newsletter article that was oriented to teachers and parents. I am happy to share the details for this process with anyone who is interested, but the short version is that it was pretty good but too long, and it contained a number of mostly minor interpretation errors that required my human editing. The rest of this article (after this second paragraph) is a result of that process.


Why Neuroscience Matters in Gifted and Talented Education

Neuroscience research by and large supports “best practice” in gifted education. It can justifiably be used as an important rationale for advocacy work.

  • Neuroplasticity research strongly supports talent-development models. Brains are malleable, especially during childhood, and the right learning environments (along with a talent-spotter attitude in adults) can elevate performance in underrepresented students.
  • Neuroscience is increasingly influencing education policy and practice. Understanding what is valid versus what is “neuromyth” allows us to apply research responsibly. “Brain research,” when accurate, can be appropriately persuasive.
  • The science aligns with key needs in an AI-driven world. Teachers must help students develop critical thinking, executive-function skills, and the confidence to tackle appropriately challenging tasks – all areas supported by neuroscience.


What We Know—and What We Don’t

Despite public fascination, neuroscience rarely gives simple answers. Much of the research uses small samples or lab-based imaging studies, which makes direct translation to classrooms tricky. Still, several findings consistently emerge. 

  • General cognitive ability relates to factors like processing speed, working memory, and neural efficiency.
  • Giftedness cannot be “seen” or identified directly in the brain, but neuroscience helps explain why advanced learners need depth, complexity, and cognitive stretch.
  • One of the most powerful and proven neuroscience “interventions” is exercise, particularly aerobic forms – literally getting more oxygen to the brain.

Three Takeaways and Related AI Issues

  1. Focus on Talent Development – Shift the question from “Does this child qualify for gifted programming?” to “What opportunities will help this child grow?” Early and sustained challenge can lift more students to high levels of performance. AI issue: Unequal access to enrichment via technology can become a digital-divide issue.
  2. Teach Thinking and Executive Functions – Executive functions (EFs) can be improved through explicit instruction, practice, and appropriately challenging tasks. Strengthening these skills benefits all learners, including those with gifts and talents from underrepresented groups. AI issue: Students must be able to evaluate information, detect bias, and justify reasoning – all important skills in the age of AI.
  3. Provide True Cognitive Challenge – Advanced learners need meaningful stretch. “Productive struggle” supports brain growth, motivation, and long-term learning. Research on “desirable difficulties” shows that students thrive when learning stretches them just beyond their comfort zone. AI issue: There are many new AI tools that can help educators “differentiate up,” designing tasks that provide appropriate challenge to advanced learners.


In Short

Neuroscience reinforces what many teachers and parents observe: talent grows through opportunity, an intentional focus on thinking skills, and an appropriate level of challenge (OBDRAC). As AI reshapes education, these principles become even more essential for helping all students – including high-ability learners – reach their potential.



*Adapted (by the author and by ChatGPT) from Clinkenbeard, P. R. (October 23, 2025). Neuroscience and gifted education: Practical implications in the age of AI. Presented virtually at the 3rd World Giftedness Center International Conference, Dubai, UAE.



- Dr. Pam Clinkenbeard, Professor Emeritus, UW-Whitewater and Past President, WATG

Recent Posts

December 11, 2025
This post highlights that gifted students are more than test scores, using an ACT example to show how teens can set goals while balancing well-being, interests, and social-emotional needs.
December 11, 2025
This post shares 12 strategies to help gifted, 2E, and 3E children manage emotions, routines, and social needs over winter break, reminding caregivers to tailor support to each child.
By Jackie Drummer November 25, 2025
A reflection on the journey of gifted adults, highlighting six developmental stages, key insights from Dr. Ellen Fiedler, and an invitation to explore Bright Adults.
By Dal Drummer November 10, 2025
Almost every week we see headlines in the news lamenting the current state of students and education. Titles such as these – “Chronic Absenteeism Continues to Plague School Systems,” “Why Do Students Spend So Much Time on Their Phones?,” “Should Phones Be Banned From the Classroom and Will That Improve Test Scores?" – are prolific and often worrisome. This often leads to proposed solutions, some which undoubtedly have been tried (both successfully and unsuccessfully) in the past. Why do educational leaders (and politicians) continue to “reinvent the wheel” by proposing and utilizing the same (but re-branded) solutions to student learning problems over the years, dropping one after another in favor of a latest “trend” that will supposedly fix everything? Why aren’t we getting results? I feel the above questions are related and may have an easy solution, one that has produced many studied and practical results. It is a solution that I have experienced in my decades of teaching as well. Recently I read an article in K-12DIVE entitled Drawing connections between art and science can improve academic outcomes by Briana Mendez-Padilla. K-12DIVE is a news outlet that provides business journalism and in-depth reporting on trends in the pre-kindergarten through 12th-grade education sector. In this article, students in Mississippi had persistent low test scores until the school decided to make changes and incorporate the arts (and even artists) to work with and alongside the sciences. As a result, test scores rose significantly, as did social interactions between students. In this article, the author points out that today’s teachers are often competing with technology for kids’ attention. Just taking away technology doesn’t insure greater learning, nor does ignoring it. Teachers need to utilize what attracts kids to technology if they want better attendance and better learning. The author points out that students learn best in different ways (as we know); some students have auditory learning preferences, some kinesthetic, and some visual. Some learn best by reading, others not. Many of today’s students are also heavily into music, movement, and video. This is evidenced by their “plugged in” behaviors and their preference for online creation and viewing. It then stands to reason that the more ways a teacher can present material or allow students to learn using their technology, the more the students will be involved in their learning. Learning or showing evidence of learning can be much more than drawing a picture of the plant cycle (straight out of the science book) or making a shoebox diorama, practices of the past. As educators, we need to move our practices into spaces that our students inhabit. Some simple examples about different ways of learning/demonstrating wave action using science and the arts together could be students acting out wave action through dance using their different music choices (singly or in groups). Teachers could also, using light, prisms, and paints, show how colors can mix and affect how we see our world, and then critically analyze the use of light and color in water portrayed in historic and contemporary works of art (found online, of course). Or students could create music that they feel mimics wave action, mixing and remixing existing music or creating their own. Many of them have technological expertise and a great desire to use it. By teaching our curriculum in their world, using the arts as a vehicle, will, many believe, generate renewed excitement in learning. Finally, in order to develop curricular connections between science and the arts, administrators have to deliberately set aside time for curricular collaboration. Collaboration isn’t something that just magically happens; it takes time, interest, and creativity to connect them, a marriage of will and skill! Professional development time should be used to develop curricular connections, therefore enhancing teachers’ skillsets. Better teaching makes for better student outcomes. Coordination between the arts and sciences shouldn’t take much of a monetary investment; it can often be free, and the results can be priceless. Many free connections exist within community arts organizations, and they can enhance a school or school system. I know this because of my decades of experience as a visual arts specialist and arts coordinator in Milwaukee’s Lincoln Center of the Arts. The arts and sciences have much in common. In fact, through the Renaissance period, the arts and sciences weren’t two separate fields. They were one! They have many connections. Let’s put them back together using today’s technology! See a need for this in your child’s school? Share this article (and others) with them. For more information I direct you to the following articles. https://artsintegration.com/what-is-arts-integration-in-schools/ https://www.kennedy-center.org/education/resources-for-educators/classroom-resources/articles-and-how-tos/articles/collections/arts-integration-resources/what-is-arts-integration/ https://www.edutopia.org/topic/arts-integration/ - Dal Drummer, WATG Board Advisor
By Jenna Cramer November 10, 2025
This blog explains why gifted students need intellectual peers for deeper learning, motivation, and belonging.
By Sarah Kasprowicz November 10, 2025
Highlights Dr. Zakreski’s guidance on supporting neurodivergent gifted learners by asking targeted questions, recognizing sensory cues, and preventing overload.
By Maria Katsaros-Molzahn October 27, 2025
Dr. Dante Dixon inspired educators to help students turn hope into action – building motivation, equity, and resilience to unlock their full potential.
By Jackie Drummer October 27, 2025
Jackie Drummer explores how curiosity, creativity, and critical thinking foster cross-domain thinking—helping students connect ideas and innovate across subjects.
By Maria Katsaros-Molzahn October 13, 2025
The 2025 WATG Conference united educators, parents, and students to explore gifted education topics, inspire hope and resilience, and build momentum for NAGC 2026.
October 10, 2025
This article spotlights CESA 1 PAGE, a parent–educator group in SE Wisconsin that unites districts to offer enrichment, cultural, and STEM opportunities.
Show More