The Paradox of Copying

Mary Pape • June 18, 2025

Have you noticed that most of the videos or content we watch on social media are just copies or very similar versions of each other? Original ones are rare. People are moving away from creating unique content because constantly focusing on what others are doing can cause us to diminish our own creative thinking skills. Instead of developing our unique perspectives, we fall into a cycle of copying. This risk is not just limited to social media creators; it also applies to artificial intelligence programs like ChatGPT that people use often nowadays. 

 

AI models like ChatGPT are called “generative” because they can create new responses based on patterns learned from large datasets. However, these responses are still generated from existing data patterns and examples. In other words, the more similar questions you ask, the less unique and creative the responses become over time. Although we might be impressed by ChatGPT responses, these responses actually belong to other human minds. They are an amalgamation of much data – a “hive mind” of it. You may think that those responses are very creative, but this may be because you’re not as creative as other people. And over time, with excessive reliance on these tools, you may lose your creative edge. Many of us could fall into this trap, and gifted people are not immune. 

 

The greatest power of the human mind is the ability to bring together new and different perspectives in unpredictable ways. But if we only focus on similar perspectives and ideas, it can dull our creativity. As a result, while social media and AI can be sources of inspiration for creativity, simply trying to over rely on them can gradually weaken our creative abilities. This message must be shared widely… "this is your mind on AI…"

 

Global content sources like social media and AI can gather different views and ideas, which is great for creativity, but they can also lead to monotony. When copying replaces originality, the depth of creativity decreases, and the richness of global thought becomes monotonous. True creative thinking requires developing unique ideas and preserving diversity. In short, modern technology can bring great benefits, but may also pose some risks. It’s important that we weigh both.


Uzeyir Ogurlu, WATG Board Member.

By Jackie Drummer November 25, 2025
A reflection on the journey of gifted adults, highlighting six developmental stages, key insights from Dr. Ellen Fiedler, and an invitation to explore Bright Adults.
By Dal Drummer November 10, 2025
Almost every week we see headlines in the news lamenting the current state of students and education. Titles such as these – “Chronic Absenteeism Continues to Plague School Systems,” “Why Do Students Spend So Much Time on Their Phones?,” “Should Phones Be Banned From the Classroom and Will That Improve Test Scores?" – are prolific and often worrisome. This often leads to proposed solutions, some which undoubtedly have been tried (both successfully and unsuccessfully) in the past. Why do educational leaders (and politicians) continue to “reinvent the wheel” by proposing and utilizing the same (but re-branded) solutions to student learning problems over the years, dropping one after another in favor of a latest “trend” that will supposedly fix everything? Why aren’t we getting results? I feel the above questions are related and may have an easy solution, one that has produced many studied and practical results. It is a solution that I have experienced in my decades of teaching as well. Recently I read an article in K-12DIVE entitled Drawing connections between art and science can improve academic outcomes by Briana Mendez-Padilla. K-12DIVE is a news outlet that provides business journalism and in-depth reporting on trends in the pre-kindergarten through 12th-grade education sector. In this article, students in Mississippi had persistent low test scores until the school decided to make changes and incorporate the arts (and even artists) to work with and alongside the sciences. As a result, test scores rose significantly, as did social interactions between students. In this article, the author points out that today’s teachers are often competing with technology for kids’ attention. Just taking away technology doesn’t insure greater learning, nor does ignoring it. Teachers need to utilize what attracts kids to technology if they want better attendance and better learning. The author points out that students learn best in different ways (as we know); some students have auditory learning preferences, some kinesthetic, and some visual. Some learn best by reading, others not. Many of today’s students are also heavily into music, movement, and video. This is evidenced by their “plugged in” behaviors and their preference for online creation and viewing. It then stands to reason that the more ways a teacher can present material or allow students to learn using their technology, the more the students will be involved in their learning. Learning or showing evidence of learning can be much more than drawing a picture of the plant cycle (straight out of the science book) or making a shoebox diorama, practices of the past. As educators, we need to move our practices into spaces that our students inhabit. Some simple examples about different ways of learning/demonstrating wave action using science and the arts together could be students acting out wave action through dance using their different music choices (singly or in groups). Teachers could also, using light, prisms, and paints, show how colors can mix and affect how we see our world, and then critically analyze the use of light and color in water portrayed in historic and contemporary works of art (found online, of course). Or students could create music that they feel mimics wave action, mixing and remixing existing music or creating their own. Many of them have technological expertise and a great desire to use it. By teaching our curriculum in their world, using the arts as a vehicle, will, many believe, generate renewed excitement in learning. Finally, in order to develop curricular connections between science and the arts, administrators have to deliberately set aside time for curricular collaboration. Collaboration isn’t something that just magically happens; it takes time, interest, and creativity to connect them, a marriage of will and skill! Professional development time should be used to develop curricular connections, therefore enhancing teachers’ skillsets. Better teaching makes for better student outcomes. Coordination between the arts and sciences shouldn’t take much of a monetary investment; it can often be free, and the results can be priceless. Many free connections exist within community arts organizations, and they can enhance a school or school system. I know this because of my decades of experience as a visual arts specialist and arts coordinator in Milwaukee’s Lincoln Center of the Arts. The arts and sciences have much in common. In fact, through the Renaissance period, the arts and sciences weren’t two separate fields. They were one! They have many connections. Let’s put them back together using today’s technology! See a need for this in your child’s school? Share this article (and others) with them. For more information I direct you to the following articles. https://artsintegration.com/what-is-arts-integration-in-schools/ https://www.kennedy-center.org/education/resources-for-educators/classroom-resources/articles-and-how-tos/articles/collections/arts-integration-resources/what-is-arts-integration/ https://www.edutopia.org/topic/arts-integration/ - Dal Drummer, WATG Board Advisor
By Jenna Cramer November 10, 2025
This blog explains why gifted students need intellectual peers for deeper learning, motivation, and belonging.
By Sarah Kasprowicz November 10, 2025
Highlights Dr. Zakreski’s guidance on supporting neurodivergent gifted learners by asking targeted questions, recognizing sensory cues, and preventing overload.
By Maria Katsaros-Molzahn October 27, 2025
Dr. Dante Dixon inspired educators to help students turn hope into action – building motivation, equity, and resilience to unlock their full potential.
By Jackie Drummer October 27, 2025
Jackie Drummer explores how curiosity, creativity, and critical thinking foster cross-domain thinking—helping students connect ideas and innovate across subjects.
By Maria Katsaros-Molzahn October 13, 2025
The 2025 WATG Conference united educators, parents, and students to explore gifted education topics, inspire hope and resilience, and build momentum for NAGC 2026.
October 10, 2025
This article spotlights CESA 1 PAGE, a parent–educator group in SE Wisconsin that unites districts to offer enrichment, cultural, and STEM opportunities.
By Martha Lopez October 10, 2025
This article explores hope’s role in student outcomes. It offers strategies for educators and parents to cultivate hope in learners.
By German Diaz September 25, 2025
Gifted education ensures equity, fosters innovation, and nurtures leaders. MPS students shine with national honors, proving its lasting impact.
Show More